ArticleEpidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil2025
Association between adherence to the Food Guide golden rule and health characteristics among adult Brazilian women: a cross-sectional study with VIGITEL data, 2018-2021.
Article in Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neurobiological insights into the effects of ultra-processed food on lipid metabolism and associated mental health conditions: a scoping review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess association of adherence to the golden rule of the Food Guide for the Brazilian Population with health characteristics among adult women according to sociodemographic characteristics.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study with 102,057 women interviewed by the Chronic Disease Risk and Protective Factors Surveillance Telephone Survey System in the Brazilian state capital cities and Federal District between 2018 and 2021. Outcome variables included obesity, hypertension, diabetes, depression and negative self-rated health. Adherence to the golden rule was rated by scores (-13 to +12 points) that combined the consumption of ultra-processed foods (negative) and fresh and minimally processed foods (positive). This score was categorized according to consumption tertiles, with low adherence (first tertile), moderate adherence (second tertile) and high adherence (third tertile). Logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) (by sociodemographic variables) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of the outcomes in relation to adherence to the Guide.
resultsCompared to low adherence, moderate adherence was inversely associated with obesity (OR 0.86; 95%CI 0.78; 0.93) and negative self-rated health (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.62; 0.84). High adherence was inversely associated with obesity (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.65; 0.79), hypertension (OR 0.85; 95%CI 0.78; 0.93), depression (OR 0.69; 95%CI 0.59; 0.82) and negative self-rated health (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.45; 0.67).
conclusionAdherence to the Guide's golden rule was inversely associated with chronic diseases and negative self-rated health among adult Brazilian women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.