ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
[Ways of acting out the congenital Zika virus syndrome among families in Bahia State, Brazil].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This investigation aims to present a network of events in which congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) was woven. The study closely followed the care needs of the families, the fears, the biomedical uncertainties, the difficulties in understanding, the challenges outlined at the moment in which difficult decisions were made and the entire flow of events that show the reality of the disease. The methodological orientation was based on the assumption that CZS emerged as it was manipulated in different practices in various spaces as a reference. By conceiving the processes of health and disease in this way, this study was inspired by the work of ethnographer Annemarie Mol. It is, therefore, a praxiography, understood as a research method, which does not focus on the investigation of meanings regarding the disease, but on the practices in which it is acted out. The rise of the disease was not only the result of medical activity, but the care practices of the families, their experiences, perceptions, discoveries and understandings about the disease also contributed to the production of what we know today as CZS. In this investigation, we sought to show how CZS appeared as a result of the actions performed by a variety of agents, causing different ways of reading the body and dealing with the disease to coexist incorporated into the various activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.