ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
[Elements of misinformation in the public perception of the dengue vaccine in Brazil: an analysis of comments on social media].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guanidines: Privileged Scaffolds Against Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Perceptions of the Eco-Bio-Social Determinants of Dengue Transmission in São Paulo, Brazil: A Mixed-Methods Study.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2024, dengue in Brazil reached alarming epidemiological rates, being considered potentially the worst year in history. In this context, the arrival of vaccines against the disease represents a great advance for Brazil's public health. However, misinformation and fake news about vaccines pose a threat to the success of immunization campaigns. In this article, we aim to understand the elements of misinformation present in the public perception about the arrival of dengue vaccines in Brazil. To this end, 1,550 comments were collected on online posts from five major media outlets in the country, resulting in five thematic categories created from a categorical content analysis: disinfodemic, misinformation vectors, vaccine politicization, vaccine hesitancy/vaccine refusal, and personal experiences. It is concluded that almost 1/3 of the comments collected have some misleading content, which reinforces the need to create different strategies to confront and combat misinformation. The scenario of vaccine hesitancy and politicization of public health-related issues that exist as a consequence of COVID-19 is of great relevance for discussions in the public sphere and a challenge to be faced in the coming years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.