SynthesisCadernos de saude publica2025
Socioeconomic factors impacting treatment delays in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review investigates associations between socioeconomic factors and treatment delay in adults with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC). Observational studies were searched across five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Virtual Health Library) and grey literature. No restrictions were imposed about language or year of publication. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. The primary outcome was defined as the cut-off points of treatment delays, which was addressed by the studies included. The certainty of evidence was assessed following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. In total, 10 retrospective cohort studies were included in the narrative synthesis. Type of insurance plan, sex, older ages, non-white patients, low education level, treatment in public or regional hospital, need for transition care, and living in regional/remote areas were factors associated with treatment delay for OOSCC. However, methodological limitations regarding the adjustment for confounders, the heterogeneity of the definition of delay (different cut-off points), socioeconomic variables, and the lack of eligible articles from different countries resulted in a very low certainty of evidence due to severe issues of bias, inconsistency, and indirectness according to the GRADE guidelines. The association between socioeconomic factors and OOSCC treatment delay is inconclusive by the available data. Given the complexity of the determinants of access to timely OOSCC treatment, further research is recommended in different countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.