ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Dressed in Collagen: 2D and 3D Cardiac Fibrosis Models.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current trends, applications, and challenges in three-dimensional bioprinting for cardiovascular disease models and therapies.iScience · 2026Review
- Heart-On-a-Chip with Integrated Ultrasoft Mechanosensors for Continuous Measurement of Cell- and Tissue-Scale Contractile Stresses.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Versatile hiPSC Models and Bioengineering Platforms for Investigation of Atrial Fibrosis and Fibrillation.Cells · 2026Review
- Gene Expression ofIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), the leading cause of death worldwide, and their strong association with fibrosis highlight the pressing need for innovative antifibrotic therapies. In vitro models have emerged as valuable tools for replicating cardiac fibrosis 'in a dish', facilitating the study of disease mechanisms and serving as platforms for drug testing and development. These in vitro systems encompass 2D and 3D models, each with its own limitations and advantages. 2D models offer high reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and high-throughput capabilities, but they oversimplify the complex fibrotic environment. On the other hand, 3D models provide greater biological relevance but are more complex, harder to reproduce, and less suited for high-throughput screening. The choice of model depends on the specific research question and the stage of drug development. Despite significant progress, challenges remain, including the integration of immune cells in cardiac fibrosis and optimizing the scalability and throughput of highly biomimetic systems. Herein, we review recent in vitro cardiac fibrosis models, with a focus on their shared characteristics and remaining challenges, and explore how in vitro fibrosis models of other organs could inspire novel approaches in cardiac research, showcasing potential strategies that could be adapted to refine myocardial fibrosis models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.