ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Evaluating Surface Properties and Cellular Responses to Surface-Treated Different Triple Periodic Minimal Surface L-PBF Ti6Al4V Lattices for Biomedical Devices.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Triple periodic minimal surface lattices have been introduced to dental and medical devices. Numerous designs of these porous structures have been proposed, but the impact of the surface properties of the different topographic lattices are not fully understood. So, this study aimed to examine the cellular and inflammatory responses to different lattice designs, including strut-based and surface-based lattices. Human osteoblasts, human umbilical vein endothelial cells, and monocytes were used to evaluate cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation, and inflammatory response on lattices after surface treatment strategies. Post-surface treatment of chemical etching, in addition to improving the surface roughness by removing some adhered metal powder, also modulated the surface energy. The lattice design had no significant impact on cell proliferation, but higher cell proliferation was found in post-surface treated lattices, regardless of topographic design. For angiogenesis, there was no difference in the release of pro-angiogenic growth factors between topographic designs or post-surface treatment groups. Moreover, lattices with the post-surface treatment were prone to have a lower inflammation phenotype when compared to an as-printed lattice, though not in a significant manner. This study implies that different topographic lattice designs may not have a major impact on bone ingrowth; nevertheless, post-surface treatment and surface properties of lattice may have an influence on a macrophage-induced inflammatory response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.