Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40243574›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Experimental Conditions to Retrieve Intrinsic Cooperativity α Directly from Single Binding Assay Data Exemplified by the Ternary Complex Formation of FKBP12, MAPRE1 and Macrocyclic Molecular Glues.

Jan Schnatwinkel, Richard R Stein, Michael Salcius, Julian L Wong, Shu-Yu Chen, Marianne Fouché, Hans-Joerg Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan SchnatwinkelNanoTemper Technologies, 81379 München, Germany.
Richard R SteinNovartis, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Michael SalciusNovartis, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6695-6513
Julian L WongNovartis, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA.
Shu-Yu ChenDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0009-1762-0269
Marianne FouchéNovartis, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Hans-Joerg RothNovartis, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0000-5517-775X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incorporation of disease-relevant targets into ternary complexes in a compound-dependent manner by utilizing an assisting chaperone has become a common modality as far as bifunctional ternary complex-forming compounds are concerned. In contrast, examples of ternary complexes formed by molecular glues are much rarer. Due to their lack of significant binary (independent) target affinity, their identification cannot yet be achieved by rational methods and is, therefore, much more challenging. However, it is precisely for that reason (given the associated advantages) that their systematic identification and application in drug discovery has recently attracted particular interest. In contrast to bifunctional ternary complex-forming compounds, molecular glues retrieve a significant part of their thermodynamic stability through newly induced chaperone-target or glue-target interactions that occur only in the ternary complex. These interactions lead to enhanced ligand binding-termed intrinsic cooperativity α-which can be retrieved via the apparent cooperativity either by monitoring ligand binding through the chaperone or through the target protein. In this publication, the advantage of measuring the apparent cooperativity (to determine the cooperativity α) by the weaker binding protein is discussed and illustrated using the example of ternary complexes between FKBP12, MAPRE1 and macrocyclic molecular glues derived from the rapamycin binding motif for FKBP12. Furthermore, the impact of the following three parameters on the apparent cooperativity is illustrated: (1) the concentration of the monitoring protein, (2) the excess of the counter protein, and (3) the affinity of the glue to the weaker binding protein in combination with the degree of intrinsic cooperativity α. From this, experimental conditions to determine the intrinsic cooperativity α with only one binding assay and without the need for a comprehensive mathematical model covering all simultaneous events under non-saturating conditions are highlighted. However, this framework requires a binding assay capable of measuring or at least estimating very weak binary affinities. If this is not possible for experimental reasons, but binding assays for both proteins are available within a normal bandwidth and the affinity to the stronger binding protein is not too high, it is discussed how the binding curve for the weaker binding protein in the presence of an excess of the weaker binding protein can be used to overcome the missing binary

Indexed as

Macrocyclic CompoundsTacrolimus Binding Protein 1AHumansLigandsProtein BindingThermodynamicsLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsTacrolimus Binding Protein 1AcooperativityFKBP12MAPRE1measuring weak affinitiesspectral shift methodternary complexes

Identifiers

PMID40243574
PMCPMC11989212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.