ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Impact of Persistent Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals on Human Nuclear Receptors: Insights from In Silico and Experimental Characterization.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- PFAS Exposure and Metabolic Disorders: Mechanistic Insights into Lipid and Glucose Homeostasis.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Metabolic Disruption and Steatosis Induced by Drinking Water Disinfection Byproducts in HepG2 and HUH7 Cells.Toxics · 2026Article
- The Impact of Forever Chemicals on Protein Structure and Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular Determinants of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Binding to Estrogen Receptors.Toxics · 2025Article
- Uncovering the Tumorigenic Blueprint of PFOS and PFOA Through Multi-Organ Transcriptomic Analysis of Biomarkers, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Targets.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are notable for their persistence, bioaccumulation, and associations with cancer. Human nuclear receptors (hNRs) are primary targets disrupted by these persistent EDCs, resulting in alterations to xenobiotic metabolism, lipid homeostasis, and endocrine function, which can lead to carcinogenic effects. Despite their hazardous effects, comprehensive studies on EDC interactions and their impacts on hNRs remain limited. Here, we profiled the interactions of persistent EDCs, including PFAS, plastic additives, bisphenols, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and phthalates, with key hNRs such as PXR, CAR, PPARα, PPARγ, PPARδ, AR, and RORγt. Through controlled molecular docking simulations, we observed strong binding of the EDCs to these receptors. Further analysis showed that EDCs exhibit strong binding activity towards hNRs by preferentially interacting with hydrophobic amino acids, namely leucine, isoleucine, methionine, and phenylalanine. PFAS demonstrated the highest binding affinity, characterized by a combination of complementary hydrophobic interactions from their fluorinated carbon chains and polar interactions from their functional groups (e.g., carboxylate, sulfonate) across all receptors. Distinct polycyclic and hydrophobic trends, contributing to strong NR binding, were evident in non-PFAS and nonplastic EDCs. The hNR activity assay in HepG2 cells revealed agonistic effects of dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) and di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) on most receptors, except for PPARα. The hNR transcription factor pathway assay in HepG2 cells demonstrated increased gene expression of VDRE and PXR, suggesting potential chronic effects on xenobiotic metabolism and calcium homeostasis. Overall, our findings demonstrate the need for further research into the endocrine disruption and carcinogenic effects of these persistent EDCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.