Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40243435›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Dual Topoisomerase Inhibitor Is Highly Potent and Improves Antitumor Response to Radiotherapy in Cervical Carcinoma.

Inken Flörkemeier, Hannah L Hotze, Anna Lena Heyne, Jonas Hildebrandt, Jörg P Weimer, Nina Hedemann, Christoph Rogmans, David Holthaus, Frank-André Siebert, Markus Hirt and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Inken FlörkemeierDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5885-6352
Hannah L HotzeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Anna Lena HeyneDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Jonas HildebrandtPharmaceutical Institute, Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Jörg P WeimerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4528-8509
Nina HedemannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Christoph RogmansDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
David HolthausDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7012-5605
Frank-André SiebertClinic of Radiotherapy, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Markus HirtClinic of Radiotherapy, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Robert PoltenInstitute of Experimental Hematology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Michael MorganInstitute of Experimental Hematology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Rüdiger KlapdorDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Axel SchambachInstitute of Experimental Hematology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Astrid DempfleInstitute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2618-3920
Nicolai MaassDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Marion T van MackelenberghDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Bernd ClementPharmaceutical Institute, Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Dirk O BauerschlagDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF 03VP08790Federal state of Schleswig-Holstein Open Access PublikationsfondsMedical Faculty of Kiel University MD scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in vaccination and early detection, the total number of cases and deaths from cervical cancer has risen steadily in recent decades, making it the fourth most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Low-income countries in particular struggle with limited resources and treatment limitations for cervical cancer. Thus, effective medicines that are simple to manufacture are needed. The newly developed dual topoisomerase inhibitor P8-D6, with its outstanding ability to induce apoptosis, could be a promising option. In this study, the efficacy of P8-D6 in combination with radiochemotherapy against cervical carcinoma was investigated in established cell lines and in a translational approach in ex vivo patient cells by measuring the cytotoxicity, cell viability and caspase activity in vitro in 2D and 3D cell cultures. Treatment with P8-D6 resulted in significantly greater cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction compared to standard therapeutic cisplatin in both 2D and 3D cell cultures. Specifically, a considerably stronger anti-proliferative effect was observed. The treatment also led to morphological changes and a loss of membrane integrity in the 3D spheroids. Radiotherapy also benefited greatly from P8-D6 treatment. In fact, P8-D6 was a more potent radiosensitizer than cisplatin. Simple synthesis, favorable physicochemical properties and high potency make P8-D6 a promising cervical cancer drug candidate.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsTopoisomerase InhibitorsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansAntineoplastic AgentsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsTopoisomerase Inhibitorscervical cancerchemoradiotherapydual topoisomerase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID40243435
PMCPMC11988843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.