ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
Cochlear-implant dichotic listening performance and effort are disrupted with functional ear asymmetry.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When speech understanding abilities differ across the ears, auditory attention and listening effort could be impacted. Twenty listeners with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) completed this experiment. Fourteen listeners had symmetric and six listeners had asymmetric functional hearing. Listeners completed monotic and dichotic digit recall with digit string lengths of four and six digits and attention directed to each ear. Pupil size was monitored as an index of listening effort. Individual differences in working memory and inhibition abilities were measured. It was hypothesized that ear asymmetry would lead to poorer listening performance and higher listening effort, and that cognitive abilities would predict both performance and listening effort. Greater differences in performance across ears were observed with asymmetry. Lower listening effort was observed with asymmetry, regardless of which ear was attended. Poorer working memory abilities predicted higher listening effort. These results suggest that asymmetric listeners may experience reduced perception of a poorer ear, and that individuals with poorer working memory abilities are at risk to experience higher listening effort in complex listening environments with CIs. More broadly, these results suggest that the salience of sensory inputs contributes to auditory attention ability and use of cognitive resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.