ArticleAccounts of chemical research2025
Discovery of Crystalline Inorganic Solids in the Digital Age.
Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery at the Interface between Known Structure Types: The Layered Y10NixCu1-xTi4O24 Family.Inorganic chemistry · 2026Article
- Replacing Quantum Chemistry With Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials: Revolution or Evolution?ACS central science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ConspectusThis Account considers how the discovery of crystalline inorganic materials, defined as their experimental realization in the laboratory, can benefit from computation: computational predictions afford candidates for laboratory exploration, not discoveries themselves. The discussion distinguishes between the novelty of a material in terms of its composition and in terms of its structure. The stepwise modification of the composition of a parent material with retention of its crystal structure can reduce the risk in seeking new materials and offers the ability to fine-tune properties which has demonstrated value in optimizing materials performance. However, the parent structures first need to be identified, thus emphasizing the importance of materials discovery beyond simple analogy as a key complementary activity. We describe a workflow we have developed to accelerate discovery of such new structures by addressing many of the challenges, in particular the identification of chemistries that are likely to afford materials and the targeting of reactions within their compositional spaces. Data on experimentally isolated phases are used to prioritise candidate chemistries with machine learning, and crystal structure prediction is used to target compositions within those chemistries for synthesis by computationally constructing probe structures whose energies are indicative of the accessible stability at a given composition. We show how this workflow usefully identifies the parts of chemical space offering new materials and has afforded new structures in practice. The discovery of the solid lithium electrolyte Li
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.