Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40243372›Full record

ReviewImmunity, inflammation and disease2025

Immune Checkpoint Molecules: A Review on Pathways and Immunotherapy Implications.

Erfan Rezazadeh-Gavgani, Reza Majidazar, Parisa Lotfinejad, Tohid Kazemi, Ali Shamekh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Insights into Reproductive Immunology and Placental Pathology, 2nd Edition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erfan Rezazadeh-GavganiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Reza MajidazarStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Parisa LotfinejadImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6142-9036
Tohid KazemiImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali ShamekhStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0950-2619

Funding

This research was supported by the Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number: 67949).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToday, treating cancer patients with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), by targeting immune checkpoints, is one of the most outstanding immunotherapeutic methods. Immune checkpoints are special molecules having regulatory role in immune system responses. Once these molecules are presented on cancer cells, these cells will be capable of evading the immune system through their own specific pathways. This Evasion can be prevented by counterbalancing immune system responses with immune checkpoints related antibodies.

aimsThe current study aimed to highlight immunotherapy and its methods, describe the immune checkpoints pathways, outline the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and recent advances in this field, and sketch an outlook on the best treatment options for the most prevalent cancers. MATERIALS &

methodsThis research implemented a narrative review method. A comprehensive literature review on the history, molecular and cellular biology, and the clinical aspects of immune checkpoint molecules was performed to illustrate the pathways involved in various cancers. Also, currently-available and future potential immunotherapies targeting these pathways were extracted from the searched studies.

resultsThe immune checkpoint family consists of many molecules, including CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT. Attempts to modify these molecules in cancer treatment led to the development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Most of these antibodies have entered clinical studies and some of them have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used in cancer patients' treatment plans. DISCUSSION: With these novel treatments and the combination therapies they offer, there is also hope for better treatment outcomes for the previously untreatable metastatic cancers. In spite of the beneficial aspects of immune checkpoint therapy, similar to other treatments, they may cause side effects in some patients. Therefore, more studies are needed to reduce the probable side effects and uncover their underlying mechanism.

conclusionBased on the data shown in this review, there is still a lack of knowledge about the complete properties of ICIs and the possible combination therapies that we may be able to implement to achieve a better treatment response in cancer patients.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint ProteinsImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansSignal TransductionAntibodies, MonoclonalImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint ProteinsCTLA‐4immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)immune modulatorsimmunotherapyPD‐1PD‐L1

Identifiers

PMID40243372
PMCPMC12004596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.