Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40243278›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2025

Tiny but significant: on the importance of thrips as pollinators.

Cristina Pop, Irene Terry, Laurence A Mound, Casper J van der Kooi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristina PopGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen NL-9747AG, The Netherlands.
Irene TerrySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112  USA.
Laurence A MoundAustralian National Insect Collection CSIRO, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Casper J van der KooiGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen NL-9747AG, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0613-7633

Funding

Australian Research Council DP1095482 and DP160102806Human Frontier Science Program RGP023/2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThrips (Thysanoptera) are minute plant and flower visitors in ecosystems across the world but are commonly viewed as notorious pests and too small to effect pollination. The role of thrips as pollinators is thus largely neglected. We provide an overview of the number of plant taxa that are pollinated by thrips, the floral traits of thrips-pollinated plants, and discuss why thrips can be effective pollinators. MAIN

findingsThrips pollination occurs in almost half of all seed plant orders, 53 families and 102 plant genera. In many taxa, thrips are the primary or only pollinator. Thrips effectiveness as pollen vectors is enhanced by enormous thrips population sizes in inflorescences, pollen loads of up to >100 grains per individual, and the ability to travel in wind streams. A meta-analysis shows that thrips can significantly contribute to seed and fruit set compared with open pollination controls. A review of the floral traits of thrips-pollinated plants suggests that there is no universal 'thripophily' pollination syndrome. One plant trait that stands out is a floral architecture that limits access to larger pollinators and gives thrips a refuge, such as globose or disc-like structures with small or slit-like openings. Some specialist systems exhibit characteristic floral or cone odours that attract thrips; however, too few systems have been studied in detail to cast a general description. Together, our results suggest that pollination by thrips is more common than has been historically perceived, and thrips should not be overlooked in pollination studies and as agents of selection of floral traits.

Indexed as

PollinationThysanopteraAnimalsFlowerscycadsevolutionfloral architecturefloral traitmeta-analysismutualismpollen loadpollinationpollination mutualismThysanoptera

Identifiers

PMID40243278
PMCPMC12464953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.