ArticleJournal of sleep research2025
Prevalence of Altered Craniofacial Morphology in Children With OSA.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Childhood Obesity and Craniofacial Growth: A Cross-Sectional Orthodontic Cephalometric Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Orthodontic Malocclusion Detection Using Multiple AI Models: A Comparative Study.Healthcare informatics research · 2026Article
- Utility of Cephalometry and Acoustic Pharyngometry for the Assessment of Moderate to Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Before Treatment in Childhood.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Maxillary Transverse Deficiency and Respiratory Problems: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Devices over the Past Decade.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Prevalence of Altered Craniofacial Morphology in Children With OSA.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) affect a significant percentage of children. Recent studies have suggested that altered craniofacial morphology may contribute to the multifactorial pathophysiology of OSA. This study aims to determine the prevalence of craniofacial abnormalities and malocclusion in children referred for polysomnography due to OSA suspicion. This is a multicentre prevalence study completed across four Canadian sites. Otherwise, healthy children (≥ 4 years old) who were seen at the sleep clinic were recruited. Upon arrival for their hospital-based overnight sleep recording, a clinical orthodontic assessment and a series of paediatric sleep questionnaires were completed for each participant. Data from 315 children (age 9.37 ± 3.70) revealed significant risk factors associated with the presence of OSA, including male sex, presence of snoring, endomorph body type, and hypertrophic tonsils. The intra-oral and facial morphologic characteristics were not significantly different between children with (AHI 9.51 ± 10.94) and without (AHI 0.84 ± 0.50) PSG-verified OSA. Factors such as maxillary constriction/posterior crossbite and a retrognathic mandible showed similar (p > 0.05) prevalence between groups. Hierarchical regression analysis showed no statistically significant facial and dental variables in predicting AHI. In conclusion, a multidisciplinary approach involving dental professionals with expertise in growth and development is crucial for the assessment of possible craniofacial abnormalities in children with OSA. Craniofacial morphology may play a limited role in the pathophysiology of OSA in most children, as no differences in the prevalence of these variables in children with and without OSA were found in this large, multicentre study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.