ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024
The Breathing IQ: an anthropometric index of diaphragmatic breathing efficiency.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breathing pattern disorders (BPDs) are becoming increasingly relevant due to the rise of respiratory illnesses but are often limited to diagnoses of hyperventilation syndrome and do not consider breathing dysfunction of mechanical origin. Impaired diaphragmatic and inefficient breathing patterns often evolve into downstream musculoskeletal and psychological consequences. Respiratory research has consistently called for the standardization of methods that can consider breathing as multifactorial and also consider breathing mechanics. Aim: This paper aims to introduce the Breathing IQ (BIQ) as a novel anthropometric index of abdominothoracic flexibility for identifying biomechanical breathing patterns and assessing diaphragmatic breathing efficiency. Method: A sample of N = 384 individuals was assessed with the BIQ pre- and post-intervention of five corrective exercises in a single 90-minute session to identify changes in the BIQ grade (A-F), as determined by measuring the breathing range of motion (ROM) and location of movement (LOM). Results: Binary-grade improvement (yes/no) occurred in 331 of 370 without an A grade at baseline (89.5%), p < 0.001. Before the intervention, 249 (64.8%) were graded an F and only 14 (3.7%) were graded an A. After the intervention, only 20 (5.2%) were graded an F and 102 (26.6%) were graded an A. Breath hold (BH) improved from pre- to post-intervention, from 37.2 (18.7) to 66.0 (26.9), with a mean change 24.3 (15.3), which was highly significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The BIQ shows preliminary potential as an effective screening tool for mechanical breathing dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.