Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242832›Full record

ReviewInternet interventions2025

The role of self-efficacy in internet-based interventions for mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Solveig Behr, Laura Martinez Garcia, Julia Lucas, Esther Kohlhase, Marie Puetz, Johanna Boettcher, Carmen Schaeuffele, Christine Knaevelsrud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internet interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Solveig BehrDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Laura Martinez GarciaDepartment of Psychology and Sociology, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Atarazanas, 4, 44003 Teruel, Spain.
Julia LucasDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Esther KohlhaseDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Marie PuetzDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Am Köllnischen Park 2, 10179 Berlin, Germany.
Johanna BoettcherDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Am Köllnischen Park 2, 10179 Berlin, Germany.
Carmen SchaeuffeleDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Christine KnaevelsrudDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Internet-based interventions (IBI) increase access to evidence-based treatments for mental disorders, but knowledge of their mechanisms of change is limited. Self-efficacy, a key factor in psychotherapy, is especially relevant in IBI due to its self-help focus. We investigated self-efficacy and related constructs as outcomes, predictors/moderators, and mediators in randomized controlled trials. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Two reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed bias. Effects were quantified using random effect models and supplemented by narrative syntheses and box score visualizations. Results: 70 studies ( Conclusion: Self-efficacy appears influential in IBI efficacy and may itself be a valuable treatment target. However, mixed results and methodological limitations in mediator studies highlight the need for further research, particularly on long-term effects.

Indexed as

Internet-based interventionsMastery, digital healthMeta-analysisSelf-efficacySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40242832
PMCPMC12002610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.