ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
A new minimally invasive cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation system using intra-operative computed tomography-guided navigation.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Surgical management of spinal metastases].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Minimally invasive cervical spine stabilization: A multicenter study of completely percutaneous pedicle screw-rod instrumentation.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive pedicle screw placement with image-guided navigation in cervical spine injuries.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Comparison of open and percutaneous navigated pedicle screw placement for traumatic injuries of the subaxial cervical spine.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Novel cervical pedicle screw design to enhance the safety insertion without compromising biomechanical strength.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since its introduction, placement of cervical pedicle screws (CPS) has been considered a procedure with a very high-risk profile. Minimally invasive CPS placement was not even considered at all. However, as surgical techniques and image guided intra-operative navigation have been refined over the last decade, navigated CPS placement has become a standard procedure in well-established spine centers. Currently, the first off-the-shelf percutaneous CPS placement platforms are becoming available. The aim of this study is to assess feasibility and accuracy of an minimally invasive surgery (MIS) CPS fixation system in a pilot series. Methods: Between January and July 2023, we treated a cohort of ten patients using a new cervical MIS platform. Forty pedicle screws were inserted percutaneously in the c-spine using intra-operative computed tomography (CT) guided navigation and retrospectively analysed for accuracy using a modified Gertzbein & Robbins (G&R) classification. Adverse events and other patient-related data were also documented. Results: Ninety percent of all screws were placed accurately (80% on perfect trajectory, 10% showed minor perforations). Another 10% (four screws) caused pedicle wall breaches between 2 and 4 mm, but were not revised, since misplacement was not associated with neurological deficit or inferior biomechanics. One patient experienced neurological deterioration, but not associated with screw misplacement. The transverse foramen was breached twice, however not endangering the vertebral arteries. Conclusions: In this pilot series MIS CPS placement yielded accurate placement rates comparable to open surgical approaches reported in the literature. Hence, MIS CPS placement appears to be a feasible and safe procedure in selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.