ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
A single straight expandable cage via a hybrid posterior-transforaminal approach with rhBMP-2 or allograft provides high fusion rates with low risk of subsidence.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early mechanical outcomes of two expandable interbody cages in minimally invasive TLIF: a comparative single-surgeon study.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Short-term clinical efficacy of arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal spinal surgery- transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segment low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: A retrospective cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to the ongoing debate surrounding the clinical impact of surgical technique; cage type (expandable Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from consecutive patients who underwent a hybrid P-TLIF by a senior spine surgeon between August 2017 and May 2022. A single straight expandable interbody cage was inserted obliquely after laminectomy and bilateral facetectomies. Cages were packed with either rhBMP-2 or DBA. Consecutive patients received rhBMP-2 prior to withdrawal (Australia, March 2020), and then DBA was used. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included visual analogue scale (VAS) back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) measured at preoperative, postoperative 6-week, 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month. Computed tomography (CT) imaging, assessed by an independent radiologist, was conducted postoperative day-2 for instrumentation positioning then at either 6-, 12-, or 24-month to assess subsidence and interbody/posterolateral fusion (Bridwell classification). If fusion was achieved no further CTs were undertaken. Results: This cohort consisted of 81 (54.3% female) patients with a mean age of 57.3±12.5 years. rhBMP-2 was used in 60 (74.1%) and DBA in 21 (25.9%) patients. Total clinical complication rate was 27.2% including five patients requiring reoperation. Asymptomatic radiologic subsidence rate was 7.4% and clinical subsidence rate was 1.2%. Total (interbody and posterolateral) fusion was achieved at 6-month in 34.4% and 55.7%, 12-month in 76.8% and 88.4%, and 24-month in 86.3% and 93.2% of patients. There was a non-significant difference in fusion rates at each timepoint between rhBMP-2 and DBA. Preoperative pain, disability, and function all significantly improved postoperatively. Mean VAS back/leg (7.8±0.8, 7.7±0.9), and ODI (35.8±6.6) significantly (P<0.001) decreased (2.7±1.8, 1.9±2.3, 13.6±5.8); SF-12 physical/mental (27.4±3.8)/(38.1±8.3) showed significant improvements (P<0.001) at 12-month follow-up (47.1±8.8, 52.1±8.7). The mean follow-up time was 20.3±6.1 [12-24] months. Conclusions: A hybrid P-TLIF with a single straight titanium expandable cage permitted safe cage insertion, guided repositioning, and controlled expansion. Patients demonstrated significant improvements in pain, disability and function with low subsidence and high CT fusion rates over 24-month follow-up. The use of DBA in this cohort showed no significant difference in fusion rates across 24-month when compared to rhBMP-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.