ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
The modern application of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a narrative review of perioperative considerations and surgical pearls.
Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and Predictors of Symptomatic Retroperitoneal Fluid Collection Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Posterior Intradiscal Osteotomy With Posterior Approach Anterior Column Release at L5-S1 for Rigid Flat Back Deformity: A Single-Approach Alternative to ALIF or PSO for Sagittal Balance Restoration.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Article
- Intraoperative bradycardia leading to cardiac arrest during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in a morbidly obese patient-a rare complication and management strategy: a case report.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has become a pivotal technique in managing chronic back pain, radiculopathy, neurogenic claudication, and spinal deformity. This review aims to compare ALIF with other fusion methods, highlight its advantages and disadvantages, and provide surgical insights to enhance perioperative outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, focusing on publications from the past two decades. Articles were selected based on relevance, study design, and the inclusion of key perioperative considerations and surgical techniques. Only English-language studies were considered. Key Content and Findings: This review examines the historical evolution of ALIF, its current clinical applications, and the development of associated surgical techniques. It discusses preoperative evaluations, imaging strategies, and patient selection criteria. Key findings highlight that ALIF offers superior disc height restoration and segmental lordosis compared to other fusion techniques. However, it presents unique challenges such as potential vascular and visceral injuries. The review also outlines critical surgical pearls for effective ALIF execution and strategies to mitigate common complications like subsidence and nerve root injuries. Conclusions: ALIF is a robust technique for lumbar spine pathology, providing significant benefits in appropriate patient populations. This review underscores the importance of meticulous surgical planning and technique to optimize outcomes. Future research should focus on long-term comparative studies and the development of enhanced surgical instruments and protocols. Implementing these insights into clinical practice may improve patient outcomes and influence surgical guidelines and policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.