Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242809›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Improving outcome prediction in oropharyngeal carcinoma through the integration of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging radiomics.

Heleen Bollen, Rüveyda Dok, Frederik De Keyzer, Sarah Deschuymer, Annouschka Laenen, Johannes Devos, Vincent Vandecaveye, Sandra Nuyts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heleen BollenLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Rüveyda DokLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Frederik De KeyzerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Sarah DeschuymerLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Annouschka LaenenLeuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Center, University of Leuven 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Johannes DevosDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Vincent VandecaveyeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Sandra NuytsLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Locoregional recurrence (LRR) is the primary pattern of failure in head and neck cancer (HNC) following radiation treatment (RT). Predicting an individual patient's LRR risk is crucial for pre-treatment risk stratification and treatment adaptation during RT. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of integrating pre-treatment and mid-treatment diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI radiomic parameters into multivariable prognostic models for HNC. Materials and methods: A total of 178 oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy (CRT) were analyzed on DW-MRI scans. 105 radiomic features were extracted from ADC maps. Cox regression models incorporating clinical and radiomic parameters were developed for pre-treatment and mid-treatment phases. The models' discriminative ability was assessed with the Harrel C-index after 5-fold cross-validation. Results: Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM)-correlation emerged as a significant pre-treatment radiomic predictor of locoregional control (LRC) with a C-index (95 % CI) of 0.66 (0.57-0.75). Significant clinical predictors included HPV status, stage, and alcohol use, yielding a C-index of 0.70 (0.62-0.78). Combining clinical and radiomic data resulted in a C-index of 0.72 (0.65-0.80), with GLCM-correlation, disease stage and alcohol use as significant predictors. The mid-treatment model, which included delta (Δ) mean ADC, stage, and additional chemotherapy, achieved a C-index of 0.74 (0.65-0.82). Internal cross-validation yielded C-indices of 0.60 (0.51-0.69), 0.56 (0.44-0.66), and 0.63 (0.54-0.73) for the clinical, combined, and mid-treatment models, respectively. Conclusion: The addition of Δ ADC improves the clinical model, highlighting the potential complementary value of radiomic features in prognostic modeling.

Indexed as

diffusion-weighted MRIFunctional imagingModellingOropharyngeal carcinomaPredictive outcomeRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID40242809
PMCPMC12002943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.