Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242808›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Organs at risk proximity in central lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: A comparison of four-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance-guided breath-hold delivery techniques.

Nicolas Giraud, Hilâl Tekatli, Famke L Schneiders, John R van Sornsen de Koste, Marco Marzo, Miguel A Palacios, Suresh Senan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolas GiraudAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hilâl TekatliAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Famke L SchneidersAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
John R van Sornsen de KosteAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marco MarzoAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Miguel A PalaciosAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Suresh SenanAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher toxicity rates are associated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to central lung tumors. Breath-hold (BH) magnetic resonance-guided SABR (MR-SABR) can reduce doses to organs at risk (OAR). We quantified the planning target volumes (PTV) to OAR distance in 45 lesions treated using MR-SABR and generated a corresponding four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) based PTV (motion-encompassing internal target volume plus 5 mm). For lesions located ≦3 cm from airways, BH MR-SABR increased the median PTV distance to OAR by 3.7 mm. For lesions ≦3 cm from pericardium, median PTV-OAR separation increased by 2.0 mm with BH. These findings highlight the advantage of BH SABR for central lung tumors.

Indexed as

IGRTLungMR-guided radiotherapySABR

Identifiers

PMID40242808
PMCPMC12002652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.