ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Development and external multicentric validation of a deep learning-based clinical target volume segmentation model for whole-breast radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep ensemble optimized models for probabilistic CTV breast segmentation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: In order to optimize the radiotherapy treatment and minimize toxicities, organs-at-risk (OARs) and clinical target volume (CTV) must be segmented. Deep Learning (DL) techniques show significant potential for performing this task effectively. The availability of a large single-institute data sample, combined with additional numerous multi-centric data, makes it possible to develop and validate a reliable CTV segmentation model. Materials and methods: Planning CT data of 1822 patients were available (861 from a single center for training and 961 from 8 centers for validation). A preprocessing step, aimed at standardizing all the images, followed by a 3D-Unet capable of segmenting both right and left CTVs was implemented. The metrics used to evaluate the performance were the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the Hausdorff distance (HD), and its 95th percentile variant (HD_95) and the Average Surface Distance (ASD). Results: The segmentation model achieved high performance on the validation set (DSC: 0.90; HD: 20.5 mm; HD_95: 10.0 mm; ASD: 2.1 mm; epoch 298). Furthermore, the model predicted smoother contours than the clinical ones along the cranial-caudal axis in both directions. When applied to internal and external data the same metrics demonstrated an overall agreement and model transferability for all but one (Inst 9) center. Conclusion: . A 3D-Unet for CTV segmentation trained on a large single institute cohort consisting of planning CTs and manual segmentations was built and externally validated, reaching high performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.