Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242732›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Exploring the balance between functionality and aesthetics: an analytical framework and pragmatic consideration of the anthropomorphism of service robots.

Xin Xin, Wenchao Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin XinBusiness School, Jilin Business and Technology College, Changchun, China.
Wenchao LiuSchool of Business Administration, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenomenon of anthropomorphism in service robots has gained significant traction across multiple service industries; however, there remains a lack of a robust theoretical framework that adequately elucidates the preference for anthropomorphic design. Following the systematic review methodology, our findings indicate that the design of service robots necessitates a careful equilibrium between functional capabilities and aesthetic considerations. Central to the concept of anthropomorphism in service robots is the attribution of human-like characteristics, motivations, intentions, and emotions to their perceived or actual behaviors, aimed at enhancing human comprehension of robotic actions and promoting meaningful social interactions. From a design standpoint, anthropomorphism fulfills cognitive requirements while also serving as a mechanism for inductive reasoning. Influential factors in the anthropomorphism of service robots include the activation of human subject knowledge, effectiveness motivation, and social motivation, alongside additional variables such as individual personality traits, contextual elements, developmental phases, and cultural backgrounds, all of which exert a direct impact. The anthropomorphism of service robots has engendered significant considerations regarding human expectations, the perceived intelligence of robots, and the management of anthropomorphic attributes. A thorough investigation into the mechanisms that underpin the anthropomorphic interpretation of service robots, along with the practical implications that emerge, can assist various service organizations in determining the appropriate types and levels of anthropomorphic service robots, while also facilitating customers' engagement with these robots in a more rational and contextually appropriate manner.

Indexed as

anthropomorphismappearance anthropomorphismbehavior anthropomorphismpsychological mechanismsservice robot

Identifiers

PMID40242732
PMCPMC12000057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.