Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242715›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Clustering and Characteristics of Acute Acquired Brain Injury Patients With Driving Resumption Difficulty: The Role of Neuropsychological Tests, Frailty, and Gait Independence.

Eisei Harayama, Yuta Miyahara, Shota Tanaka, Kota Yamauchi, Masato Osaki, Shuji Arakawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eisei HarayamaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital, Kitakyushu, JPN.
Yuta MiyaharaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital, Kitakyushu, JPN.
Shota TanakaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital, Kitakyushu, JPN.
Kota YamauchiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital, Kitakyushu, JPN.
Masato OsakiDepartment of Stroke and Neurological Center, Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital, Kitakyushu, JPN.
Shuji ArakawaDepartment of Stroke and Neurological Center, Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital, Kitakyushu, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDecisions to resume driving after acute brain injury are often difficult. Predictors of decisions depend on the results of neuropsychological tests. As a result, few studies have investigated other characteristics. This study clustered participants who received support for resuming driving after acute brain injury based on neuropsychological tests and analyzed their characteristics. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants were 74 patients with acute brain injury. Cluster analysis was used to classify participants based on attention and visuospatial cognitive functions. Each cluster group were compared using multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni method) in terms of clinical assessments, neuropsychological tests, and driving resumption ability.

resultsThe characteristics of the cluster group with poor results in the two neuropsychological tests were that they were often judged as unable to resume driving (p < 0.001), were in a state of frailty (p = 0.02), and had a low level of walking independence (p = 0.02).

conclusionsWhen helping patients with acute brain injury to return to driving, not only the results of neuropsychological tests but also assessments of frailty before onset and level of walking independence are important.

Indexed as

acute brain injurycluster analysisfrailtyresuming drivingwalking ability

Identifiers

PMID40242715
PMCPMC12003032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.