ArticleCureus2025
A Machine Learning Model for Predicting Depression in Moroccan Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly impacts the quality of life. Depression in RA exacerbates pain and reduces the likelihood of remission. Predicting depression in RA is often neglected due to time and resource constraints. Hence, this study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model for predicting depression in RA patients. Methodology We included 112 RA patients from CHU Hassan II, Fez, Morocco. Depression was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scale, and clinical data were extracted from medical records. Twelve features were used to develop five ML models: support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), logistic regression (LR), and gradient boosting classifier (GBC). Data preprocessing involved managing missing values, normalizing data, and encoding variables. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC). Results The ML-based feature selection method showed the optimal performance. The LR model performed best in predicting depression, with 76.5% accuracy, 72.2% precision, 81.2% recall, an F1 score of 0.765, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.767. Conclusions Our study highlights the significance of ML models in predicting depression in RA patients. The selected features and the LR model showed promising performance. Further research is required to validate these results and develop more advanced models. Utilizing such tools could significantly impact the management of RA patients by identifying those at risk of depression and providing appropriate psychological support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.