ArticleCureus2025
Unforeseen Impact of the IV Fluid Shortage on Patient Safety: A Case of Inadvertent Intra-arterial Injection During General Anesthesia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of the 2024 national medical fluid shortage on urologic practice in the United States: a cross-sectional survey.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accidental intra-arterial injection of medications is rare but can have devastating results. There have been many case reports written over the years illustrating this issue and the various sequelae, ranging from minimal impact on the patient to permanent tissue damage and even limb amputation. We report on a surgical case that was performed from start to finish through an unrecognized intra-arterial catheter. This case is unique as it was performed in November 2024 in the United States, which was in the midst of a severe intravenous fluid shortage due to Hurricane Helene. As a result, this case and thousands of others were done without a running IV. Instead, this case was performed by pushing medications through an IV and then flushing in the medications with a small amount of fluid from a syringe in an effort to conserve IV fluids for urgent or emergent use. We postulate that due to not having a running IV, this accidental intra-arterial catheter went unrecognized in a 90-minute surgical case. In all likelihood, with a running IV connected to an intra-arterial catheter, the IV would not have functioned normally and in troubleshooting the IV, the error would have been recognized much sooner. Consequently, the patient would not have been exposed to the dangers of receiving medications through an intra-arterial catheter. This case highlights the critical role of continuous IV fluids in detecting misplaced catheters and underscores the importance of reinstating this practice as soon as supply constraints allow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.