ArticleCureus2025
Subcutaneous Emphysema in Spontaneous Acute Colonic Rupture Mimicking an Acute Traumatic Injury.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subcutaneous emphysema often results from traumatic injuries such as pneumothorax or traumatic perforation of the bowel. In this case report, however, the authors present subcutaneous emphysema that resulted from a spontaneous colonic perforation that disguised itself as a traumatic injury in an elderly patient who was presumed to have sustained a traumatic injury. In this case, an 88-year-old male presented to the emergency department via trauma alert after being found unresponsive on the floor with extensive subcutaneous emphysema of his hips, thighs, chest, abdomen, and cervical area. He was intubated prior to arrival and had bilateral tube thoracostomies placed shortly after arrival. After stabilization, computed tomography (CT) of the head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis was performed, and he was found to have an acute colonic perforation, which resulted in extensive subcutaneous emphysema that mimicked the presumed traumatic injury on presentation. This case highlights the importance of keeping a broad differential diagnosis in patients with extensive subcutaneous emphysema. In this case, the patient presented with a presumed acute traumatic injury, though he was ultimately diagnosed with acute colonic perforation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.