Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242669›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Intersection of Brain Complexity, Functional Connectivity, and Neuropsychology: A Systematic Review.

Rebeca de Moura Targino, Mateus Aragão A Esmeraldo, Isac Cajazeiras Falcão, Kayline Macêdo Melo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebeca de Moura TarginoNeurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, BRA.
Mateus Aragão A EsmeraldoRadiology, InRad - Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BRA.
Isac Cajazeiras FalcãoDoctors for Brazil Program, Brazil's Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), Fortaleza, BRA.
Kayline Macêdo MeloPsychology, Colégio Ari de Sá, Fortaleza, BRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The definition of brain complexity is based on the principal property of the coexistence of a high degree of integration and differentiation within a single neural system. Despite the fruitful scope of emerging studies involving the applicability of brain complexity metrics, there is a notable scarcity of research focusing on the qualitative characteristics of conscious systems, which are recognized for their high complexity. These qualitative characteristics are expressed in complex cognitive processes, reflecting the interaction between distinct neuropsychological domains, such as attention, memory, language, and executive functions (EFs). Cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, for instance, emerge from the dynamic integration of distributed neural networks, underscoring the interdependence between brain complexity and cognitive functioning. In light of this, the present study aimed to evaluate how studies addressing measures of functional connectivity and brain complexity, obtained through resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI), relate to neuropsychological aspects. To achieve this, a systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and based on the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) strategy. Studies were searched in PubMed, CAPES Periodicals, and Virtual Health Library databases to identify relevant studies published between 2019 and March 2024. Articles were included based on study type, sample characteristics, methodological aspects, and specific listed variables. Exclusion criteria encompassed theoretical studies, animal research, and studies involving children/adolescents, as well as those addressing psychiatric conditions, psychoactive substance use, intervention evaluations (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation), and disorders of consciousness, due to limitations in applying neuropsychological measures. Possible limitations include the exclusion of studies with specific populations and clinical conditions, which may limit the generalizability of findings to broader, more diverse groups. After applying the selection criteria, 30 articles were chosen and fully analyzed. The results allowed for the establishment of characteristics of the research landscape in this area, initially highlighting a greater number of studies focused on functional connectivity compared to those directed at brain complexity. Additionally, EFs were identified as the most frequently addressed neuropsychological domain in the studies, consistent with the most commonly used evaluative measures in the research: Trail Making Test (TMT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and verbal fluency tasks. The findings suggest that this is an area of study still in its early stages of development, with notable gaps in the in-depth understanding of the relationships between neural network complexity metrics and neuropsychological functioning.

Indexed as

complexityfunctional connectivityfunctional magnetic resonance imagingneuropsychology assessmentresting-state functional magnetic resonance imagingsystemic literature review

Identifiers

PMID40242669
PMCPMC12002407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.