ReviewCureus2025
Intersection of Brain Complexity, Functional Connectivity, and Neuropsychology: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The definition of brain complexity is based on the principal property of the coexistence of a high degree of integration and differentiation within a single neural system. Despite the fruitful scope of emerging studies involving the applicability of brain complexity metrics, there is a notable scarcity of research focusing on the qualitative characteristics of conscious systems, which are recognized for their high complexity. These qualitative characteristics are expressed in complex cognitive processes, reflecting the interaction between distinct neuropsychological domains, such as attention, memory, language, and executive functions (EFs). Cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, for instance, emerge from the dynamic integration of distributed neural networks, underscoring the interdependence between brain complexity and cognitive functioning. In light of this, the present study aimed to evaluate how studies addressing measures of functional connectivity and brain complexity, obtained through resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI), relate to neuropsychological aspects. To achieve this, a systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and based on the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) strategy. Studies were searched in PubMed, CAPES Periodicals, and Virtual Health Library databases to identify relevant studies published between 2019 and March 2024. Articles were included based on study type, sample characteristics, methodological aspects, and specific listed variables. Exclusion criteria encompassed theoretical studies, animal research, and studies involving children/adolescents, as well as those addressing psychiatric conditions, psychoactive substance use, intervention evaluations (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation), and disorders of consciousness, due to limitations in applying neuropsychological measures. Possible limitations include the exclusion of studies with specific populations and clinical conditions, which may limit the generalizability of findings to broader, more diverse groups. After applying the selection criteria, 30 articles were chosen and fully analyzed. The results allowed for the establishment of characteristics of the research landscape in this area, initially highlighting a greater number of studies focused on functional connectivity compared to those directed at brain complexity. Additionally, EFs were identified as the most frequently addressed neuropsychological domain in the studies, consistent with the most commonly used evaluative measures in the research: Trail Making Test (TMT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and verbal fluency tasks. The findings suggest that this is an area of study still in its early stages of development, with notable gaps in the in-depth understanding of the relationships between neural network complexity metrics and neuropsychological functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.