Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242660›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2025

A chronopharmacological comparison of ciprofol and propofol: focus on sedation and side effects.

Xuehan Li, Xinqing Yang, Chen Chen, Ziqing Yu, Houping Wang, Ruixue Liu, Jianrong He, Bin Shu, Guangyou Duan, Erquan Zhang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xuehan Li *Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xinqing Yang *Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chen ChenNational Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ziqing YuNational Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China.
Houping WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ruixue LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jianrong HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Bin ShuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Guangyou DuanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Erquan ZhangNational Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dapeng JuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
He HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Propofol is a commonly used intravenous anesthetic in clinical practice, while ciprofol, a propofol derivative, also targets GABAA receptors with enhanced anesthetic potency. Regarding chronopharmacology, it remains unclear whether the new drug ciprofol has improved anesthetic effect and less side effects compared with propofol. First, we assessed the critical anesthetic dosage (D

Indexed as

chronopharmacologyciprofolcritical anesthesia dosagedrug distributionGABAARpropofol

Identifiers

PMID40242660
PMCPMC11999936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.