ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Follow up rates and patient interest in clinical care after mild traumatic brain injury presenting to a level 1 trauma center: a TRACK-TBI prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transient Association Between Elevated NSE and Reduced fT3 Levels Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A 12-Month Prospective Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Risk reduction after bicycle, scooter, and skateboard-related head injuries through helmet use and brain injury education: A trauma center quality improvement initiative.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Prior Psychiatric Disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress, Depressive and Anxiety Disorder after Traumatic Brain Injury with Glasgow Coma Scale Score 13-15: A TRACK-TBI Study.Neurotrauma reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate the rates of clinical follow-up and patient interest in clinical follow-up within the first year of traumatic brain injury (TBI) with presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 13 and 15. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study which enrolled patients with TBI first evaluated at a 1 of 23 level 1 trauma centers ( Results: By 2 weeks, 43% of participants had followed up with a clinical provider; cumulative follow-up within the first year was 63%. Overall, 61% of participants interested in clinical follow-up care reported receiving clinical follow-up care. Participants who received follow-up care reported that it helped at an 86% rate. Of those not interested in follow-up care, 42% reported receiving clinical follow-up care and 86% of those receiving care reported that it helped. Approximately 44% of participants who reported "I did not think I need follow-up" at 2 weeks had incomplete recovery (GOSE<8), 40% had persistent symptoms, and 19% had lower quality of life at 12-months post-injury. Conclusion: Participants not interested in follow-up care had high rates of poor functional recovery, persistent symptoms and lower quality-of-life at 12 months following traumatic brain injury with GCS 13-15. Education and provider emphasis on the importance of clinical follow-up after hospital discharge with TBI need to be enhanced. Prioritizing timely clinical follow-up for adult patients with TBI with GCS 13 to 15 is critical for improving rates of long-term recovery in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.