ReviewAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Efficacy of aficamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), a morbid hereditary condition, is characterized by asymmetrical intraventricular septum enlargement, obstructing blood flow from the left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT) and lowering cardiac output. Aficamten, a novel selective, oral myosin inhibitor, has been suggested to reduce myocardial hypercontractility and decrease LVOT gradient in oHCM. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for relevant literature from inception up to May 2024. Six studies focusing on efficacy and safety aficamten was included. Pooled outcome estimates were reported as mean difference (MD) and 95 % CI using random effect model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I Results: We found a significant change of -143.23 (pg/ml) NT-proBNP [95 % CI -564.8 to 278.4, I Conclusion: We found that aficamten significantly reduced myocardial stress surrogates and functional disability parameters. The small sample sizes, diverse study designs and single-arm analysis limit our findings. More robust trials with larger sample sizes are required to establish conclusive evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.