Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242552›Full record

ReviewFundamental research2025

A recent survey on instance-dependent positive and unlabeled learning.

Chen Gong, Muhammad Imran Zulfiqar, Chuang Zhang, Shahid Mahmood, Jian Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen GongSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China.
Muhammad Imran ZulfiqarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China.
Chuang ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China.
Shahid MahmoodHigher Education Department, Punjab, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Jian YangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training with confident positive-labeled instances has received a lot of attention in Positive and Unlabeled (PU) learning tasks, and this is formally termed "Instance-Dependent PU learning". In instance-dependent PU learning, whether a positive instance is labeled depends on its labeling confidence. In other words, it is assumed that not all positive instances have the same probability to be included by the positive set. Instead, the instances that are far from the potential decision boundary are with larger probability to be labeled than those that are close to the decision boundary. This setting has practical importance in many real-world applications such as medical diagnosis, outlier detection, object detection, etc. In this survey, we first present the preliminary knowledge of PU learning, and then review the representative instance-dependent PU learning settings and methods. After that, we thoroughly compare them with typical PU learning methods on various benchmark datasets and analyze their performances. Finally, we discuss the potential directions for future research.

Indexed as

Cost-sensitive learningInstance-dependent positive and unlabeled learningLabeling assumptionLabel noise learningScoring functionWeakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID40242552
PMCPMC11997483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.