ArticleFundamental research2025
Graph contrastive learning with node-level accurate difference.
Article in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graph contrastive learning (GCL) has attracted extensive research interest due to its powerful ability to capture latent structural and semantic information of graphs in a self-supervised manner. Existing GCL methods commonly adopt predefined graph augmentations to generate two contrastive views. Subsequently, they design a contrastive pretext task between these views with the goal of maximizing their agreement. These methods assume the augmented graph can fully preserve the semantics of the original. However, typical data augmentation strategies in GCL, such as random edge dropping, may alter the properties of the original graph. As a result, previous GCL methods overlooked graph differences, potentially leading to difficulty distinguishing between graphs that are structurally similar but semantically different. Therefore, we argue that it is necessary to design a method that can quantify the dissimilarity between the original and augmented graphs to more accurately capture the relationships between samples. In this work, we propose a novel graph contrastive learning framework, named Accurate Difference-based Node-Level Graph Contrastive Learning (DNGCL), which helps the model distinguish similar graphs with slight differences by learning node-level differences between graphs. Specifically, we train the model to distinguish between original and augmented nodes via a node discriminator and employ cosine dissimilarity to accurately measure the difference between each node. Furthermore, we employ multiple types of data augmentation commonly used in current GCL methods on the original graph, aiming to learn the differences between nodes under different augmentation strategies and help the model learn richer local information. We conduct extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets and the results show that our DNGCL outperforms most state-of-the-art baselines, which strongly validates the effectiveness of our model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.