Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242534›Full record

ArticleFundamental research2025

Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of breast cancer by mammography microcalcification.

Qing Lin, Wei-Min Tan, Jing-Yu Ge, Yan Huang, Qin Xiao, Ying-Ying Xu, Yi-Ting Jin, Zhi-Ming Shao, Ya-Jia Gu, Bo Yan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Complete disappearance of ductal carcinomaAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Qing LinCancer Institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Wei-Min TanSchool of Computer Science, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Intelligent Visual Computing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Jing-Yu GeCancer Institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yan HuangDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Qin XiaoDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Ying-Ying XuDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.
Yi-Ting JinDepartment of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Zhi-Ming ShaoCancer Institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Ya-Jia GuDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Bo YanSchool of Computer Science, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Intelligent Visual Computing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Ke-Da YuCancer Institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammography is the mainstream imaging modality used for breast cancer screening. Identification of microcalcifications associated with malignancy may result in early diagnosis of breast cancer and aid in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is a promising technique due to its efficiency and accuracy. Here, we demonstrated that an automated deep-learning pipeline for microcalcification detection and classification on mammography can facilitate early diagnosis of breast cancer. This technique can not only provide the classification results of mammography, but also annotate specific calcification regions. A large mammography dataset was collected, including 4,810 mammograms with 6,663 microcalcification lesions based on biopsy results, of which 3,301 were malignant and 3,362 were benign. The system was developed and tested using images from multiple centers. The overall classification accuracy values for discriminating between benign and malignant breasts were 0.8124 for the training set and 0.7237 for the test set. The sensitivity values of malignant breast cancer prediction were 0.8891 for the training set and 0.7778 for the test set. In addition, we collected information regarding pathological sub-type (pathotype) and estrogen receptor (ER) status, and we subsequently explored the effectiveness of deep learning-based pathotype and ER classification. Automated artificial intelligence (AI) systems may assist clinicians in making judgments and improve their efficiency in breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

Indexed as

Breast cancerClassificationDeep learningMammographyMicrocalcification detection

Identifiers

PMID40242534
PMCPMC11997558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.