Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242526›Full record

ReviewFundamental research2025

Intelligent design and synthesis of energy catalytic materials.

Linkai Han, Zhonghua Xiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linkai HanState Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China.
Zhonghua XiangState Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient energy conversion and storage are crucial for the sustainable development and growth of renewable energy sources. However, the limited varieties of traditional energy catalytic materials cannot match the fast-expansion requirement of raising various clean energy for industrial applications. Thus, accelerating the design and synthesis of high-performance catalysts is necessary for the application of energy equipment. Recently, with artificial intelligence (AI) technology being advanced by leaps and bounds, it is feasible to efficiently and precisely screen materials and optimize synthesis conditions in a huge unknown space. Here, we introduce and review AI techniques used in the development of catalytic materials in detail. We describe the workflow for designing and synthesizing new materials using machine learning (ML) and robotics. We summarize the sources of data collection, the intelligent algorithms commonly used to build ML models, and the laboratory modules for the intelligent synthesis of materials. We provide the illustrations of predicting the properties of catalytic materials with ML assistance in different material types. In addition, we present the potential strategies for finding material synthesis pathways, and advances in robotics to accelerate high-performance catalytic materials synthesis in the review. Finally, the summary, challenges, and potential directions in the development of AI-assisted catalytic materials are presented and discussed.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCatalytic materialsIntelligent laboratoryMachine learningRetrosynthesis analysis

Identifiers

PMID40242526
PMCPMC11997564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.