ArticleFundamental research2025
Future research of supply chain resilience: Network perspectives and incorporation of more stakeholders.
Article in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital intelligence technology adoption and supply chain security of manufacturing firms: empirical evidence from China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Supply chain resilience: A review from the inventory management perspective.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Managing supply-chain resilience and security.Fundamental research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, global supply chains face great challenges driven by events such as trade wars, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Russia-Ukraine War. Since the disruptions caused by such shocks are more systematic and the duration is harder to predict compared to natural disasters or other operational risks, we highlight two features for future supply chain research: network perspectives and incorporation of more stakeholders such as governments that can influence overarching performances of industrial and supply chains. From the network perspective, we review the literature on vulnerable nodes & links identification, risk propagation modeling, network resilience measures, and disruption mitigation strategies. We suggest promising research directions such as deriving non-probabilistic resilience measures that can incorporate dynamics, extending existing methods for bottleneck detection to the network setting, balancing efficiency and resilience in a more sophisticated way, etc. In terms of incorporating more stakeholders' roles in supply chain network decisions, we review the relevant literature and discuss research opportunities on governments' roles in global supply chains (i.e., an external circulation perspective) and in incentivizing firms' R&D and stimulating domestic demand (i.e., an internal circulation perspective). We suggest topics including global supply chain resilience evaluation using trade networks, technology networks, and firm ownership networks, the impact of trade policies with network perspectives, design of tariff and non-tariff measures under trade agreements, domestic industry relocation, evaluating the effects of government subsidies on firms' long-term innovation, and design of subsidy strategies for supply chain stability and resilience. We believe research on supply chain resilience will thrive in the years ahead, better supporting firms' and governments' decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.