ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using Online Circular Contrast Perimetry Over 6 Months: Performance and Patient Attitudes in the Developing World Setting.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Online circular contrast perimetry performed in glaucoma patients in Sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-centre comparative study in Nigeria.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Early Detection of Glaucoma and Diabetic Retinopathy in Low-Resource Settings: Barriers and Solutions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Climate-Conscious Glaucoma Care: Strategies to Minimize the Environmental Impact in the Operating Room and in the Clinic.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Online circular contrast perimetry (OCCP) provides perimetry on any computer or tablet without additional hardware. This study assessed the longitudinal performance and user feedback of home OCCP in an Asian population. Methods: Twenty glaucoma and fifteen healthy participants underwent a comprehensive ocular examination and visual field tests in clinic, using OCCP and standard automated perimetry. Within a week, participants were asked to repeat OCCP at home. OCCP was then repeated after 3 months and 6 months at home, followed by a user-experience survey. Results: No significant difference between clinic and home OCCP for test duration, false negative (FN) and fixation loss (FL) rates was found. False positive (FP) rate of home OCCP was slightly higher than that of clinic OCCP (p = 0.04). Bland-Altman plots indicated a small difference between Mean Deviation (MD) (1.26 dB, p = 0.0087) and good agreements between Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD) and Visual Index (VI) of clinic OCCP and home OCCP with insignificant difference of PSD and VI (p > 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis demonstrated good correlation of MD & VI and poor correlation of PSD between clinic OCCP and home OCCP. Over 6 months, home OCCP indicated moderate to excellent correlation of indices. Participants reported a positive attitude toward home OCCP; however, a high dropout rate was noted for the 3- and 6-month at-home testing. Conclusion: Comparable results were observed between clinic and home OCCP at baseline. Acceptable consistency of home OCCP findings over 6 months was recognized. Patients may require additional support to achieve desired adherence to at-home monitoring protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.