ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Informing health system planning for biomarker-based treatment: statistical prevalence projections for solid cancers with key pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in Australia to 2042.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term projections of cancer prevalence in Australia to 2050: a population-based statistical modelling study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Paediatric and Adult Solid Tumours Exhibiting NTRK Gene Fusions in Australia, 2020-2044: A Population-Based Statistical Modelling Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- The evolution of cancer therapies and their Implications for health technology assessment in Australia.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Targeted cancer treatment based on mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), or high tumour mutational burden (TMB) holds promise for improving patient outcomes, but presents substantial healthcare costs. Methods: Using validated statistical methods, we projected 1-year to 5-year prevalence of individuals diagnosed with solid tumours exhibiting these biomarkers in Australia to 2042, for all solid cancers combined and 23 individual cancer types/groups, and separately for all stages combined, advanced disease at diagnosis (here, distant metastasis/lymph node involvement), and advanced disease after progression post-diagnosis. Findings: The 5-year prevalence of individuals diagnosed with any solid cancer regardless of biomarker status is estimated to increase by 54·2%, from 438,346 in 2018 to 675,722 in 2042 (advanced disease at diagnosis: by 37·6% from 109,855 to 151,199), primarily due to population growth and ageing. The 5-year prevalence of individuals whose tumours exhibit a biomarker is estimated to increase accordingly, e.g. for advanced disease at diagnosis, from 3983 to 5448 for dMMR, from 2484 to 3553 for MSI, and from 13,310 to 17,893 for high TMB (representing 3·6%, 2·3% and 11·8% of 5-year prevalence of individuals with advanced disease at diagnosis, respectively; noting considerable overlap in the presence of these biomarkers). Interpretation: We present the first long-term projections for cancer prevalence associated with key pan-tumour biomarkers in Australia, to inform health policy and healthcare planning for targeted therapies. Funding: Medical Research Future Fund-Preventive and Public Health Research Initiative-2019 Targeted Health System and Community Organization Research Grant Opportunity (MRF1200535), Cancer Institute NSW Career Development Fellowship (2022/CDF1154), National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Investigator Grant (APP1194679).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.