ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Implementation of a best-practice model of care for cognitive impairment and dementia for first nations peoples attending primary care in Australia: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing brain health equity with Indigenous peoples: A critical imperative.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dementia and cognitive impairment not dementia (CIND) are under-detected amongst First Nations peoples attending primary care. This trial implemented a culturally adapted best-practice model of care to increase detection and optimise management of CIND/dementia. Methods: This closed cohort open-label, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial recruited 12 Aboriginal community-controlled primary health care services (ACCHSs) across urban, regional and remote settings in Australia. ACCHSs were eligible to participate if they conducted annual health checks, engaged in continuous quality improvement processes and had ≥55 clients aged ≥50 years. After a baseline control period, four ACCHSs were scheduled to enter the intervention phase every six months. During the intervention phase, ACCHSs were supported to embed best-practice dementia care through staff education and practice change initiatives. Co-primary outcomes were: (i) documented detection of CIND/dementia and, (ii) evidence of uptake of the diagnostic pathway measured as presence of ≥2 of: use of cognitive assessment tools, relevant pathology investigations, neuroimaging, and/or referral of clients with cognitive concerns to specialist services. Data were analysed with mixed effects complementary log-log regression. This study was registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618001485224. Findings: Between September 2018 and January 2019, 12 ACCHSs were recruited, comprising a sample of 1655 ACCHS clients aged ≥50 years (mean 60.3 ± 8.2 years), of whom 935 (56.5%) were female. One ACCHS withdrew during the study. After adjustment for time, the intervention did not show evidence of an effect for the first co-primary outcome (detection of CIND/dementia): HR = 1.53 (95% CI 0.64, 3.65). However, the intervention improved the second co-primary outcome (uptake of diagnostic pathway): HR = 2.34 (95% CI 1.05, 5.25). Intention-to-treat analyses yielded similar results. Interpretation: The co-developed best-practice model of care for cognitive impairment and dementia for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people attending primary care improved the diagnostic CIND/dementia management process. Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) and Dementia Training Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.