Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242456›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Channel component correlation analysis for multi-channel EEG feature component extraction.

Wenqiang Yan, Qi Luo, Chenghang Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenqiang YanSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Qi LuoSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Chenghang DuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis has shown significant research value for brain disease diagnosis, neuromodulation and brain-computer interface (BCI) application. The analysis and processing of EEG signals is complex since EEG are nonstationary, nonlinear, and often contaminated by intense background noise. Principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA), as the commonly used methods for multi-dimensional signal feature component extraction, still have some limitations in terms of performance and calculation. Methods: In this study, channel component correlation analysis (CCCA) method was proposed to extract feature components of multi-channel EEG. Firstly, empirical wavelet transform (EWT) decomposed each channel signal into different frequency bands, and reconstructed them into a multi-dimensional signal. Then the objective optimization function was constructed by maximizing the covariance between multi-dimensional signals. Finally the feature components of multi-channel EEG were extracted using the calculated weight coefficient. Results: The results showed that the CCCA method could find the most relevant frequency band between multi-channel EEG. Compared with PCA and ICA methods, CCCA could extract the common components of multi-channel EEG more effectively, which is of great significance for the accurate analysis of EEG. Discussion: The CCCA method proposed in this study has shown excellent performance in the feature component extraction of multi-channel EEG and could be considered for practical engineering applications.

Indexed as

channel component correlation analysiselectroencephalogram (EEG)event-related potentials (ERP)feature component extractionmulti-channel signal

Identifiers

PMID40242456
PMCPMC12000010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.