ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2025
Investigation of the beam width and profile of kilovoltage CBCT using different measurement techniques and analysis of the dosimetric effects of beam parameters.
Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the beam width and beam profile of kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV CBCT) using different measurement techniques on an O-ring linear accelerator. The effect of the imaging beam on the dosimetric parameters was analysed. Materials and methods: The uncertainty of field size adjustment, the dependence of beam width on field size, and the effect of deflection from the isocenter on the beam profile were investigated by ionization chamber detector matrices. The 2D beam profile of the CBCT was analysed by relative ionization chamber measurements. Results: The average setup uncertainties of the field sizes were 0.3 mm ± 0.02 mm. The dependence of beam width on field size investigation revealed that the largest discrepancies occurred for small field sizes, which are important in determining computed tomography dose index (CTDI) values of the kV CBCT. The beam width deviation between measured and vendor-based data was larger than 1 mm below 40 mm field of view. The pelvis protocol demonstrated the smallest CTDI value difference of 2.3%, yet presented the largest effective dose deviation of 0.12 mSv. Conclusions: The measured CTDI coefficients were higher than predicted by the manufacturer for all cases. The currently internationally recommended CTDI measurement protocols for CBCT contain no reference to the determination of the beam width as a basic element of the calculations. Based on our measurement results, the beam width parameters affect CTDI: therefore, it would be advisable to apply this type of correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.