ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Non-human primate: the new frontier model of female reproductive engineering.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Status of Animal Models for Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: Similarities to Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Applications.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- A Survey of the Reproductive Lesions in Captive Female Non-Human Primates in Italy.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reproductive engineering encompasses a range of advanced tissue engineering techniques aimed at addressing infertility that is non-curable with current assisted reproductive technology (ART). The use of animal models has been crucial for these advancements, with a notable preference for non-human primates (NHPs) given their genetic, anatomical, and physiological similarities to humans. Therefore, NHPs are invaluable for studying reproductive engineering. Thus, in reproductive studies, NHPs bridge the anatomical and physiological gaps between rodent models and humans. Their shared features with humans, such as menstrual cycles, placentation, and hormonal regulation, allow for more accurate modeling of reproductive physiology and pathology. These traits make NHPs indispensable in the exploration of reproductive engineering, including infertility treatments, genetic engineering, and uterine transplantation. Reproductive engineering is a transformative field that addresses infertility and enhances reproductive health. By leveraging the unique traits of NHPs, researchers can deepen their understanding of reproductive processes and refine ART techniques for human use. Advances in genetic engineering have enabled the creation of transgenic NHP models, which have been used to modify genes to investigate roles for various purposes, and the process, as mentioned earlier, is closely related to the ART technique, including fertility, embryogenesis, and pregnancy. Therefore, the relation to reproductive studies and the necessity of the NHP model are prerequisites for reproductive engineering. The engineering of NHPs is critically related to integrating ethical practices and exploring complementary methodologies. This review overviews the types of NHP frequently used and studies using NHP for reproductive engineering. These studies may suggest a broader way to use NHP for reproductive engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.