Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242338›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Unravelling the decision making of foraging vultures: insights from a field experiment.

Eneko Arrondo, Jorge Carracedo, Patrick McAllister, Zebensui Morales-Reyes, Martina Scacco, Roberto Pascual-Rico, Ainara Cortés-Avizanda, Jose Antonio Donazar, Marcos Moleón, Jose Antonio Sánchez-Zapata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eneko ArrondoEstacion Biologica de Donana CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1728-9800
Jorge CarracedoUniversity of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK.
Patrick McAllisterUniversity of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK.
Zebensui Morales-ReyesUniversity of La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4529-8651
Martina ScaccoDepartment of Migration and Immuno-Ecology, Max-Planck-Institut fur Ornithologie, Radolfzell, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-4051
Roberto Pascual-RicoResearch Institute of Hunting Resources (IREC), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Ainara Cortés-AvizandaInstituto Mediterraneo de Estudios Avanzados, Esporles, Illes Balears, Spain.
Jose Antonio DonazarEstacion Biologica de Donana CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9433-9755
Marcos MoleónUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-619X
Jose Antonio Sánchez-ZapataEcology Area, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Alicante, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal Foraging Theory (OFT) integrates both the consumer and the resource, yet their simultaneous assessment is uncommon. Vultures represent an ideal model for OFT studies because carrion requires no capture effort and minimal handling, allowing them to focus primarily on food searching. Here, we combined GPS tracking of 61 Iberian griffon vultures (consumers) with photo-trapping monitoring of 49 carcasses (resources) to assess the determinants of vulture foraging and the consequences for carrion consumption in two areas with different carrion abundances. First, we determined the importance of different factors (distance to the resource, hunger and competition) in the decisions of individuals of whether to descend or not on a carcass. Second, we compared carrion consumption patterns (time of carcass discovery and consumption, and maximum number of vultures gathered around the carcass) between areas. We found that distance, rather than hunger, is the primary factor determining whether a vulture descends to a carcass. In parallel, carrion was consumed similarly in areas with different resource availabilities. These findings indicate that vultures tend to eat whenever a nearby opportunity arises, consistent with a type-I functional response.

Indexed as

accelerometerGPS trackinggriffon vultureGyps fulvusoptimal foraging theorytype I functional response

Identifiers

PMID40242338
PMCPMC12000686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.