Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242280›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology2025

Prediction of BRAF and TERT status in PTCs by machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics methods: A multicenter study.

Hui Shi, Ke Ding, Xue Ting Yang, Ting Fan Wu, Jia Yi Zheng, Li Fan Wang, Bo Yang Zhou, Li Ping Sun, Yi Feng Zhang, Chong Ke Zhao and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. EnhancingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hui ShiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, China.
Ke DingDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xue Ting YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai First People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ting Fan WuBayer Healthcare, Radiology, Shanghai, China.
Jia Yi ZhengDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Li Fan WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bo Yang ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li Ping SunDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, China.
Yi Feng ZhangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, China.
Chong Ke ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hui Xiong XuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preoperative identification of genetic mutations is conducive to individualized treatment and management of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients. Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively collected data of 1076 PTC patients underwent genetic testing detection for BRAF V600E and TERT promoter between March 2016 and December 2021. Radiomics features were extracted from routine grayscale ultrasound images, and gene status-related features were selected. Then these features were included to nine different ML models to predicting different mutations, and optimal models plus statistically significant clinical information were also conducted. The models underwent training and testing, and comparisons were performed. Results: The Decision Tree-based US radiomics approach had superior prediction performance for the BRAF V600E mutation compared to the other eight ML models, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.767 versus 0.547-0.675 (p < 0.05). The US radiomics methodology employing Logistic Regression exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting TERT promoter mutations (AUC, 0.802 vs. 0.525-0.701, p < 0.001) and coexisting BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations (0.805 vs. 0.678-0.743, p < 0.001) within the test set. The incorporation of clinical factors enhanced predictive performances to 0.810 for BRAF V600E mutant, 0.897 for TERT promoter mutations, and 0.900 for dual mutations in PTCs. Conclusion: The machine learning-based US radiomics methods, integrated with clinical characteristics, demonstrated effectiveness in predicting the BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations in PTCs.

Indexed as

BRAF V600EMachine learningPapillary thyroid carcinomaPredictionRadiomicsTERT promoter

Identifiers

PMID40242280
PMCPMC12002893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.