ArticleJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology2025
Prediction of BRAF and TERT status in PTCs by machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics methods: A multicenter study.
Article in Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- EnhancingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- State of the Art on Thyroid Cancer Biology and Oncology.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Ultrasound radiomics for preoperative evaluation of Ki-67 proliferation index in papillary thyroid carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preoperative identification of genetic mutations is conducive to individualized treatment and management of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients. Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively collected data of 1076 PTC patients underwent genetic testing detection for BRAF V600E and TERT promoter between March 2016 and December 2021. Radiomics features were extracted from routine grayscale ultrasound images, and gene status-related features were selected. Then these features were included to nine different ML models to predicting different mutations, and optimal models plus statistically significant clinical information were also conducted. The models underwent training and testing, and comparisons were performed. Results: The Decision Tree-based US radiomics approach had superior prediction performance for the BRAF V600E mutation compared to the other eight ML models, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.767 versus 0.547-0.675 (p < 0.05). The US radiomics methodology employing Logistic Regression exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting TERT promoter mutations (AUC, 0.802 vs. 0.525-0.701, p < 0.001) and coexisting BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations (0.805 vs. 0.678-0.743, p < 0.001) within the test set. The incorporation of clinical factors enhanced predictive performances to 0.810 for BRAF V600E mutant, 0.897 for TERT promoter mutations, and 0.900 for dual mutations in PTCs. Conclusion: The machine learning-based US radiomics methods, integrated with clinical characteristics, demonstrated effectiveness in predicting the BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations in PTCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.