ArticleBMC digital health2025
The completeness, accuracy and impact on alerts, of wearable vital signs monitoring in hospitalised patients.
Article in BMC digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04581031 (COntinuous Signs Monitoring In Covid-19 Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
COntinuous Signs Monitoring In Covid-19 Patients
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Computer-assisted sensing in periprosthetic joint infection : Current evidence and future perspectives for wearables].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Implementation of Remote Patient Monitoring and Earlier CERT Activation: Effects on ICU Transfer and Mortality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Wearable Devices in Healthcare Beyond the One-Size-Fits All Paradigm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Use of wearable vital signs sensors (WVSSs) to monitor hospitalised patients is growing but uncertainty exists about how such sensors should be adopted into existing practice. The aim of this observational study was to determine the completeness of data capture and accuracy of measurements recorded by a suite of WVSSs. The implications of using such measurements to derive early warning scores was also assessed. Methods: Adult inpatients with Covid-19 wore four WVSSs recording heart rate/respiratory rate (HR/RR), oxygen saturation (SpO Results: Forty-eight patients were monitored for 204 days with the sensors. Median sensor wear was 3.9(IQR:1.7-5.9), 3.9(IQR:1.6-5.9) and 3.8(IQR:0.9-5.9) days for HR/RR, temperature and SpO Conclusions: Agreement between vital signs recorded by wearable sensors and concurrent traditional vitals is poor. In this context, data from wearable sensors should not be used in existing track and trigger systems. Trial registration: The COSMIC-19 study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (registration: NCT04581031, date of registration: Oct 6th 2020). Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-025-00151-x.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.