ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Construction of the preoperative staging prediction model for cervical cancer based on deep learning and MRI: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer remains a significant global health concern, particularly for women. Accurate preoperative staging is crucial for treatment planning and long-term prognosis. Traditional staging methods rely on manual imaging analysis, which is subjective and time-consuming. Deep learning-based automated staging models offer a promising approach to enhance both accuracy and efficiency. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed preoperative MRI scans (T1 and T2 stages) from 112 cervical cancer patients. Seven deep learning models-DenseNet, FBNet, HRNet, RegNet, ResNet50, ShuffleNet, and ViT-were trained and validated using standardized preprocessing, data augmentation, and manual annotation techniques. Convolutional neural networks were employed to extract multidimensional imaging features, forming the basis of an automated staging prediction model. Results: Among all tested models, HRNet demonstrated the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 69.70%, recall of 68.89%, F1-score of 68.98%, and precision of 69.62%. ShuffleNet ranked second, with slightly lower performance, while ViT exhibited the weakest predictive ability. The ROC curve analysis confirmed HRNet's superior classification capability, with an AUC of 0.7778, highlighting its effectiveness in small-sample datasets. Conclusion: This study confirms that deep learning models utilizing MRI images can enable automated cervical cancer staging with improved accuracy and efficiency. HRNet, in particular, demonstrates strong potential as a clinical decision-support tool, contributing to the advancement of precision medicine and personalized treatment strategies for cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.