SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Response efficacy of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in salivary gland cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Salivary gland carcinoma (SGC) is an infrequent malignancy characterized by various pathological subtypes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as promising therapeutic strategies for several cancers. Evidence suggests that ICIs may be effective against rare neoplasms, including SGC. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in treating salivary gland cancers. Method: A thorough search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases up to 24 February 2024. The title, abstract, and full text of related articles were extracted and screened, and the quality of the included articles was assessed. The data extracted were then analyzed. The research protocol of this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on the PROSPERO website. Results: Altogether, a total of five cohort studies and three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total population of 532 were included in these meta-analyses. These studies were conducted in the USA, Japan, France, and China. The average age of the patients was between 53 and 67 years. Our analyses showed an increase in progression-free survival in the cohort studies and RCTs, and the pooled effect is 1.12 (95% CI 1-1.25) and 1.14 (95% CI 1.07-1.20), respectively, in patients with SGC who received PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with salivary gland cancer can significantly increase progression-free survival. Due to the high heterogeneity of the studies, more RCTs with a larger sample size are required to prove the association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.