ReviewJournal of the Endocrine Society2025
Vitamin D Deficiency and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Vitamin D Status and Sepsis Outcomes: A PRISMA-Compliant Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of Vitamin D status and clinical outcomes in critically ill neonates.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is common in paediatric populations, and its relationship with critical care outcomes warrants further investigation. Objective: The aim is to examine the association between VDD and clinical outcomes in children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of VDD on clinical outcomes in PICU patients. A comprehensive search of Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane databases was conducted. Our primary outcomes were mortality and sepsis incidence, while secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), need for inotropic support, and need for and duration of mechanical ventilation. Eligible studies included infants and children aged 1 month to 18 years admitted to the PICU, with baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels measured on admission. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality. Pooled estimates were obtained using a random-effects model. Results: Out of 2298 screened studies, 27 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4682 patients. VDD was defined as 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels <20 ng/mL and <30 ng/mL in 22 and 5 studies, respectively. VDD was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.05, 95% CI 1.21-3.48) and a greater need for inotropic support (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.43-2.85) than children with vitamin D sufficiency (VDS). No differences were observed between VDD and VDS groups in terms of sepsis incidence postadmission, LOS, or the need for and duration of mechanical ventilation. Conclusion: VDD in critically ill pediatric patients was associated with increased mortality and higher need for inotropic support. Further research is warranted to evaluate the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.