Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242205›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025

Choice of numerical implementation of spatial contrast calculation impacts microcirculation quantitation in laser speckle contrast imaging.

Marc Chammas, Frédéric Pain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marc ChammasUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut d'Optique Graduate School, CNRS, Laboratoire Charles Fabry, Palaiseau, France.
Frédéric PainUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut d'Optique Graduate School, CNRS, Laboratoire Charles Fabry, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9854-6025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) allows noninvasive imaging of microcirculation. Its scope of clinical applications is growing, yet the literature lacks a comparison of the accuracy of methods used to compute the spatial contrast Aim: We aim to evaluate the impact on flow quantitation of different computational approaches used to derive Approach: We compare numerical calculation of Results: For simulation data, we found variations of up to 58% for the blood flow index in the LSCI approach. Nonlinear fitting of the MESI model was less affected with discrepancies of only a few percent. Considering experimental data, the LSCI approximation led to Conclusions: Numerical methods used to calculate

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedLaser Speckle Contrast ImagingMicrocirculationAlgorithmsAnimalsBlood Flow VelocityComputer SimulationMice2D filtersblood flowconvolutionlaser speckle contrast imagingspatial contrast

Identifiers

PMID40242205
PMCPMC12003051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.