Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242204›Full record

ArticleVisual cognition2024

Visual long-term memory is not made more precise with medial-frontal direct-current stimulation.

Gengshi Hu, Geoffrey F Woodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gengshi HuVanderbilt University, Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center.
Geoffrey F WoodmanVanderbilt University, Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center.

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI David J. Calkins · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
Training in Vision ResearchT32EY007135 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEOFFREY F WOODMAN · 1994 to 2026
$5.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research suggests that applying anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) to the medial-frontal cortex can improve how quickly subjects learn to make simple discriminations (i.e., red from blue). Here, we tested the idea that this enhanced task learning is attributable to superior encoding of relevant information into visual long-term memory. Thirty subjects completed an anodal stimulation session and a sham session, with order counterbalanced across subjects, before performing recognition-memory tasks using pictures of real-world objects and visually presented words or nonwords. These tasks allowed us to detect potential memory differences across types of memoranda. Contrary to the hypothesis that the medial-frontal cortex helps control encoding fidelity, we found that anodal tDCS delivered over this brain region did not significantly improve subjects' memory for visual stimuli, regardless of stimulus type. Our findings show no evidence that targeting medial-frontal cortex with tDCS changes the fidelity of our visual long-term memories.

Indexed as

long-term memorymedial-frontal cortextranscranial direct-current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40242204
PMCPMC12002555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.